The sheet metal unions are losing the war against nonunion sheet metal shops: Local 36 lost five shops; Local 170 lost two; and Local 18 lost three. We should be adding union shops and members not losing them. Are sheet metal unions giving up on organizing union shops and acquiring new members?
I live in northern California, specifically Shasta County, north of Marysville, in the jurisdiction of Local 104. There are now no union shops north of Marysville. The nonunion shops number about fifty to sixty shops and that is a lot of union work lost. We, in Shasta-Trinity counties, just passed a $138 million school and union college prevailing wage jobs and no union workers received any of the $138 million in jobs.
I have never seen any union reps on the jobs, checking prevailing wages or talking to the nonunion workers about unionizing. It appears like sheet metal unions have just given up the entire northern section of California, where the nonunion shops will just get stronger and keep edging toward the big cities, and start taking work from unions in the Sacramento, San Francisco and Los Angeles areas.
We will always lose in a defense battle so we must go on the offense in order to win. We are now dying little by little, day by day, and then we have unions raiding each other, which weakens unions as a whole for a short-term gain. This must stop. We cannot simultaneously go to war with the nonunion and ourselves and expect to win or even just stay alive.
The future of our unions are in our hands and it is do or die.
It’s open season the unions and we’re letting it happen. This is happening as the young people are fighting to unionize shops in the retail, fast food, ride-share, coffee shops and everything in-between. These young workers understand that in order improve overall working conditions, they have to work together and organize.
The kids are making us look bad.
There are three phases of a general strike and unions must plan for one. Those three phases are: 1. general strike in an industry 2. general strike in a community 3. general national strike We need to move away from being on the defensive and move toward a good offensive. The American Federal of Labor (AFL) could not have held a general strike if it wanted to because they had thousands of different contracts that expired at different times of the year. This was done deliberately so that there is no consolidation of power for a general strike. Also, nowadays, there is no law agency that will support labor, except the National Labor Relations Board (NLBR), which has been under attack and in decline for years. This leaves the burden of change up to unions, and unless unions work together, little will change. We essentially have a combination of job trusts, which are not as strong as contracts, and the courts can break easily because the NLBR will be further weakened and essentially elim...
Comments
Post a Comment